>>Not that you'd want to, but VC++ can be used.
>
>True, but C++ is on a completely different animal all-together. And, as some have already commented, the piece never comes out to say that VFP is actually better at these tasks. The piece just says that VFP is "extremely fast".

I made the original post here. I read the article three times to make sure I read it correctly..and I agree with that statement.

>
>Still, it is nice to see VFP in a positive light such as this..

Yup, it is.