Information générale
Catégorie:
Base de données, Tables, Vues, Index et syntaxe SQL
>>>>Is view based on tables from separate DBCs is a bad idea in general?
>>>
>>>I don't know - I've never done it.
>>
>>Hi,
>>a view or (a SELECT SQL) with more than one database works fine as long as you use complete naming for the table in FROM - JOIN clauses (DBCname!TableName).
>>
>>SENDUPDATES will work as well.
>>The rules for view's properties are the same as if you have one DBC. ALLWAYS use "DBCname!TableName" for fieldnames and tables.
>>
>>Finaly SET RELATION TO ,LOCATE, SEEK, SEEK() will all lead to the same result.
>>But this is the same as with one DBC.
>>For me, there is no general idea - it's by everybodys mind to use the one or the other way.
>>
>>You need to find out what is fast - and what needs a minimum code to enter. ::)
>>
>>Lutz
>
>Thanks a lot, Lutz. For this particular application I realized, that I don't need to include the second table in a view anyway.
>
>Thanks again.
Hi Nady,
this means absolute minimum to code? Sounds great. ::)
Lutz
Précédent
Répondre
Voir le fil de ce thread
Voir le fil de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement
Voir tous les messages de ce thread
Voir tous les messages de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement