Jerry,
>You still don't get it.
>
>It's not *OR*. There's only ONE "Source File".
>
>You know; like .C, .BAS, >>> .PRG <<<.
>
>And let's not start the "I don't want the code Forms in PRGs" circle again; just keep repeating: "two-way", "two-way", "two-way", ...
I totally agree with you...
Craig, if you have ever worked with the latest Delphi or with JBuilder, you would see what Gerry is saying about two-way tools. One part of the tool is ALL text (wonderful, beautiful, standard, ever-portable, diff-able text) and the other is the visual representation of that text (if such a visual representation exists. It really is a wonderful thing.
Text works better for source control, for readability in all editors, and for cross-platformability (not that I think the Fox will ever run on Linux, but ya never know).
Opinions aside, it would have to be agreed that two-way tools using text-based files is an intriguing concept, and potentially more useful than a binary representation like VCX, SCX, etc, etc.
JoeK
Précédent
Répondre
Voir le fil de ce thread
Voir le fil de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement
Voir tous les messages de ce thread
Voir tous les messages de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement