Tom,
>Doug;
>
>If in fact Judge Jackson was biased, would it be appropriate to begin the trial again? What the appeals court has determined seems reasonable after the events we have been allowed to be aware of.
>
>Tom
Well, the folks who mattered in making that decision made a 7-0 decision that he was biased. <g>
I don't think that the trial needs to be retried - just the penalty phase with a new judge.
Best,
DD
A man is no fool who gives up that which he cannot keep for that which he cannot lose.
Everything I don't understand must be easy!
The difficulty of any task is measured by the capacity of the agent performing the work.
