Hi Michelle,

I agree that those are problems. I also agree that a date, especially in a consistent place (and different colour is good too) might go a long way toward solving those problems.

As for mis-categorizing or just not categorizing, I guess any one of us is free to move then about. But I think I'd be reluctant generally. Maybe Michel could designate a staffer to watch over this one document and apply some consistent judgement as to placement (if something seems misplaced). Possibly even move unclear ones to a new "need more information" category.

Cheers

>One thing I would like to see is wishes consistantly added to either the top or the bottom. The categories are nice when you have a final document, but make it a real pain to see what's new. Especially when some use the categories, some don't, and over all, it's a mess. :)
>
>Although, if _everyone_ put a date added on it, the categories wouldn't be so bad because I could just scan the dates. Maybe make the dates a different (but consistant) color?
>
>Just my $.02
>
>Michelle
>
>
>>I would also like to see some "rules" suggested at the top of the new (VFP8) document. Things like:
>>
>>1) Ensure that there is sufficient detail to make the wish (purpose, objective and actual proposal (when applicable)) clear.
>>
>>2) Try to keep them strictly as wishes, leaving implementation details to the VFP team.
>>
>>3) Put a date (of origination) on any wish you create.
>>
>>4) Identify yourself as the originator of any wish and when commenting on any existing wish.
>>
>>Personally, I wouldn't mind seeing poorly-described wishes transferred from the VFP7 list put into a "need more details" calssification of the new document.
>>
>>Cheers