Jim,

Goes with the territory.

Kind of like a bunch of high profile writers all working on the same manuscript at the same time.

Fsstt... Meooww.. Fsstt Fsstt...

< LOL >


>Ohhhh... I had attributed the disappearances to bugs but your scenario is far more likely (especially when my name is attached).
>
>Cheers
>>Jim,
>>
>>Oh, ok.. I don't really care but was curious. I've had stuff over there disappear too. I guess someone thought my remarks were not worthy.. *sniff*
>>
>>
>><g>
>>
>>
>>
>>>No Doug, I'm not...
>>>
>>>This is where I hang out. In addition, my success with Wiki is mixed - I've lost edits I've done (on save) and I've seen content I've successfully added disappear.
>>>
>>>I was going to 'open' a VFP WISH LIST document here myself this moring, but after noting the categories and such I thought the better of it. Decided to leave that job to whoever built the 7.0 wish list.
>>>
>>>JimN
>>>
>>>>Jim,
>>>>
>>>>Great..
>>>>
>>>>You are thinking of using the wikis I'd presume???
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>It is probably time now to make a new document for VFP 8 Wish List.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Let's start by copying all the content from the VFP7 Wish List. Those that have used VFP7 can start weeding out functionality that's been included.
>>>>>
>>>>>I think that's a good idea.
>>>>>
>>>>>I would also like to see some "rules" suggested at the top of the new (VFP8) document. Things like:
>>>>>
>>>>>1) Ensure that there is sufficient detail to make the wish (purpose, objective and actual proposal (when applicable)) clear.
>>>>>
>>>>>2) Try to keep them strictly as wishes, leaving implementation details to the VFP team.
>>>>>
>>>>>3) Put a date (of origination) on any wish you create.
>>>>>
>>>>>4) Identify yourself as the originator of any wish and when commenting on any existing wish.
>>>>>
>>>>>Personally, I wouldn't mind seeing poorly-described wishes transferred from the VFP7 list put into a "need more details" calssification of the new document.
>>>>>
>>>>>Cheers