>>If we had two-way tools this would simply be a case of cut-and-paste. For those that have not quite grasped what two-way tools are about, please see today's thread "Life is Beautiful for PRG Based Classes" started by Mark McCasland (Message #524299).
>
>Hi Houston,
>I'll say this again. <s> This is what can be done with txt-based source files. This is not an example of two-way programming (something entirely different).

"Text" is the repository of "2-way". THIS particular "problem" would have been solved in 2-way by "text editing" the "old" class, changing the class definition, and then saving (again as "text") to the new class.

No intermediate "utility program".

The new class, can now be accessed in the "visual view" of the design tool, if need be.

Why is this not an example of 2-way ?