>Thanks guys, we will consider Terminal Server because the 2nd option (dial-up) is what we are already doing but it's not fast enough.
>
>>Hi Jess,
>>
>>There are a couple of options here:-
>>
>>1) Windows Terminal Server (there are other similar products).
>>
>>2) Dedicated PC in the server location configured with a pcAnywhere type program that will allow you second PC to connect to it over a modem - only the screen updates are sent down the line as the application is run on the dedicated PC. The downside is you will really need a dedicated PC for each possible user wanting concurrent access.
>>
>>3) Build off-line data replication into your application so that the remote PC can be run stand-alone. Another alternative here is to convert your application to store your data in SQL Server and use it's built-in replication.
>>
>>If you have only one remote user point 2 is the cheapest and quickest to implement.
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>Aaron

If you have pcAnywhere and it's not fast enough, Terminal Server is probably not going to be any faster.