>To quote from "Cool Hand Luke", "What we have here is a failure to communicate".

Not at all.

Some of us have worked with a number of "2-way tools", observed their characteristics, noted their advantages and benefits, and drawn conclusions as to what consitutes "2-way programming" and how we would like to see it implemented in VFP.

You're insisting that we're all wrong and/or prefer to argue semantics.

That's all.