>You may want to try using SAX (Simple Access XML?) rather than the full-blown XML engine. I really don't know how much of a difference will be in memory/speed, but I think SAX is designed for scenarions like the one you are describing.
>
Thanks Hector,
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/xmlsdk30/htm/sax2_gettingstarted_bestusessax.asp
is what I'm starting to read right now.