Will,
To answer your original question this appears to be resolved in VFP7.
I get -8.81 & -8.82 back respectively. I seem to recall that some work has been done to fix some of these long standing issues in VFP7.
>Hello all,
>
>I have found an irregularity with the transform command and wonder if anyone else can come up with a solution for it.. (I remember something about this in the past but without a BUTM search, I have to ask you nice Putm's)
>
>Try this in the command window..
>
>? Transform(-8.81)
>? Transform(-8.82)
>
>These 2 lines give VERY different results on 2 win 95 machines here
>VFP6 SP4
>
>Also could someone give this a try in VFP7 - maybe it will give me an excuse to upgrade!
Best,
DD
A man is no fool who gives up that which he cannot keep for that which he cannot lose.
Everything I don't understand must be easy!
The difficulty of any task is measured by the capacity of the agent performing the work.
