>>> Neither.
>>> SEEK && or SEEK()
Craig -- have you found SEEK() to be quicker than SEEK? I remember benchmarking this a while back (5.0, maybe 3.0) and found that the function version was quicker. I haven't re-tested recently, in large part because, as a result, these days I use SEEK() exclusively.
Nitpicking, I know.... but we are discussing the *best* way to do something, and so nitpicking is what it's all about.
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts. - Bertrand Russell
