>>Oh, I see.
>>
>>You had written: "In Windows Explorer right click on Drive and I see 2GB. For another server drive, which is 18GB, I see the correct results " and I understood that these were both checked from the same Explorer session on the same (Win95) system.
>>
>>In any case I was not trying to suggest that Win95 was OK.
>>
>>Cheers
>
>I meant, I open WE and check drive O (the big server) - it shows 2GB. Then I check drive G (smaller server) and get the correct result for it. George's function works correctly for 18GB server, but failed on 68GB server. It works correctly for both servers on NT server itself. Windows Explorer also shows correct results there.
>
>Anyway, it's probably time to upgrade, but it should be for the whole company. Besides, there are some problems with Windows 2000 and VFP, so I'm not sure, if we would upgrade, would we have some troubles or not...

Nayda;

You might consider windows 98 - it is much more stable than windows 95. Anyway, you could just wait for windows xp - it should solve all our problems!

Tom