>>How exactly do you mean? DOT.NET uses, well, ADO+ (a.k.a. ADO.NET) of course. >>So, without a native data engine, it doesn't compare to Fox's data engine. >>But, I like ADO.NET's dataset and tableset model. Even if the data backend >>isn't object oriented, access is. Now, if only I could keep straight how to >>do it!

I'm not trying to compare ADO.NET and VFP as data stores. What I would like to know is they compare functionally as client side data caches and how flexible they are in terms of data access.

Regards,
Charlie