>>>Well, if the Windows Explorer is returning the incorrect results on one machine and not another, then I would say that it's almost a 100% sure thing that it's a ROM BIOS issue rather than a problem with the function. Simply consider the fact that the same exact function, in the same exact DLL is being called in both cases. Yet you get the wrong result from one machine and the right result from the other.
>>>
>>>I'd look at the setup routine that you can access when the computer boots. That will give you one clue. Further, a BIOS extender will have it's own setup program you may want to check.
>>
>>George, let me repeat my statement. I checked on two Windows 95 machines in the office and both returned incorrect result. I then checked on Windows NT machine (this machine is terribly slow, each operation takes ~5-10 min., the owner said, that he is working "slowly" :)) and it returned correct results both from WE and from VFP. So, my conclusion is that it depends on OS. For purity of the experiment I should try from home, where I'm running Windows 98.
>
>Nadya,
>
>*IF* all of the Win95 machines are the same brand purchased at the same time with identical features, then your conclusion *could* be an accurate one for that office. But it surely would NOT be correct for my setup, most likely, because I no doubt have a different BIOS on my machine.
>
>If you have Win95 machines with different configurations, especially BIOS and brand name, then try all the various kinds. You will have a good chance to see what George is trying to say.
>
>JimN

Thanks, Jim. I now understood what George was trying to explain me. I can ask our Network Administrator about specific of company hardware (purchase, brand, etc.) and run this experiment on few other machines. Currently I ran it only on my and my manager computers, which both failing to show the correct result. Also our Network Administrator said, that it's an OS thing and Windows 95 doesn't recognize this amount correctly. He might be wrong, of course.