Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Why is Optimization 'Partial'
Message
From
02/10/1997 16:15:22
Larry Long
ProgRes (Programming Resources)
Georgia, United States
 
 
To
02/10/1997 16:00:16
General information
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Category:
Troubleshooting
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
00052442
Message ID:
00052939
Views:
31
>>>>>>I am trying to determine why my SQL statement is returning
>>>>>>'Partial' Optimization instead of full.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>SELECT Acctnum, DeptNum;
>>>>>> FROM Chg;
>>>>>> WHERE Chg.Acctnum='5555555';
>>>>>> INTO CURSOR cResult
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Chg is 2+ Million Records
>>>>>>There is an Index 'Acctnum' in Table Chg (Not Primary).
>>>>>>Acctnum is C 7
>>>>>>
>>>>>>SYS(3054) Returns
>>>>>> 'Using index tag acctnum to rushmore optimize table chg'
>>>>>> 'Rushmore optimization level for tabl chg: Partial'
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Am I missing something?
>>>>>
>>>>>If SET DELETED ON, you should alse have index on DELETED().
>>>>
>>>>Ditto on the above, but also...
>>>>
>>>>Unless absolutely neccesary you should run...
>>>>
>>>>SELECT * FROM Chg WHERE Chg.Acctnum='5555555' INTO CURSOR cResult
>>>>
>>>>It will be almost instantaneous since it will be using the table as is, the equivalent of "USE chg AGAIN IN 0 ALAIS cResult". Your code will be copying fields to a temp file.
>>>>
>>>>HTH //:^)
>>>
>>>Larry, does the use of * instead of listing 2 or 3 field names really make a difference? As long as you don't use a calculated field or an "AS" clause the cursor is still a filtered copy.
>>>
>>>Barbara
>>I do believe so. If you have access to a large table give it a try and let me know what you come up with //:^)
>
>Barbara is right (tested on 3 million records).
Then I guess that it would be the same as a SET FIELDS TO ... statement?
L.A.Long
ProgRes
lalong1@charter.net
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform