>>Well, just open up an FXP file and take a look. No, very little of it is recognizable, except for some literal strings and such. The point is that there's no difference between what a class runs and any other program in VFP.
>
>No, *my* point was that a person could confuse what he sees in a FXP with binary information. Arguably it is, though FXPs are not "binaries" as implied in the MS and PC world generally.
>To rag on someone for using a word that does not match a strictly technical definition is not helpful unless "binaries" is also explained.
>
>JimN
Then your point is a peripheral issue. He is being ragged upon because he claimed that macro substitution would work in one and not another. Everything else was just clarification.