Tom,

>>>The fact that Refox can decompile without requiring access to the "runtime library" contradicts your statement. Even more telling is that FPDOS .FXPs will run in the FPW environment, and vise-versa.
>>
>>No it doesn't. You posted no evidence to this, just speculation. It only proves that Refox is aware of what the tokens mean. Nothing else. In fact, I took a version of Refox that was produced before VFP 6.0. I took a simple fxp file produced by 6.0 containing nothing that wasn't in the language prior to 2.6 and it worked fine.
>>
>>You can choose to believe this or not. I really don't care.
>>
>
>George;
>
>Why is it that all computer science students end up writing a compiler as a required assignment and never an interpreter? Not that it matters, but anyway...
>
>Another why (sounding like the averave 3 year old) does ReFox chop off all reserved words and leave you with the short four letter version? I hate reading anything that looks like that!
>
>Tom


Not so with the latest version (mine's 8.02). It gives back 'whole' commands. Even gives you SCX, VCX, etc files. Didn't used to do that.