>Hi all,
>
>This is an interesting quote from an article at www.extremetech.com "VB.NOT" vs. VB.NET on the second page of the same article.
>
>"Another VB expert, Bruce McKinney pronounced VB dead, and wrote its epitaph, along with a requiem for his once must-have book, Hardcore Visual Basic. Another name for the new VB was VB.NOT, and one VB aficionado compiled a list of over a hundred language features not supported in the upcoming release. Worse yet, some of the rumors were in fact true."
>
>Should VFP coders be happy that we are no longer alone in this 'boat'?

It's still a much smaller boat (VFP) dwarfed by comparison to the VB life raft (VB.NET). There will be a lot more VB 6.0/VB.NET development than there will ever be VFP so don't get too smug.