Mike,
>>>have a look at thread #
509580>>
>>Actually, I just realized I was a bit hasty with my answer in that thread. A much better solution is found in
this MSFT KB article. Cut and paste, baby.
>
>I also see why Eric finds the function intimidating: one of the calls uses a structure. Well, guess what? I wrote another one that demystifies structures:
click here. It's only a contiguous piece of memory, with an agreed upon size of the structure elements, so pass it one.
You need to add the following line to your example:
"Processor Name: " + m.ProcessorName + CR + ;
Best,
DD
A man is no fool who gives up that which he cannot keep for that which he cannot lose.
Everything I don't understand must be easy!
The difficulty of any task is measured by the capacity of the agent performing the work.
