Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Update conflicts
Message
From
24/07/2001 11:18:05
Hilmar Zonneveld
Independent Consultant
Cochabamba, Bolivia
 
 
To
24/07/2001 10:47:32
Chuck Tripi
University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
General information
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Category:
Forms & Form designer
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
00533337
Message ID:
00534421
Views:
13
I recommend: use it only as a temporary solution.

The main problems with RLOCK() (equivalent to LOCK()) seem to be 1) the unnecessary network trafic (records are locked even if the user later decides to discard them), and 2) another user might be locked out of a record, even if the first user is only looking at a record. Or else, you provide a button to "enter edit mode" - an additional inconvenience for the user.

Hilmar.

>As I thought about this one... even though it's old fashion, it seems to be an ideal settings for me. I mean it would only allow ONE USER to edit it, regardless how powerful our development tools are today. When a second user trys to edit an open record, PING "Sorry, another time." Like I said, I haven't used OLDVAL(), CURVAL(), etc, so I don't know what those really does.
Difference in opinions hath cost many millions of lives: for instance, whether flesh be bread, or bread be flesh; whether whistling be a vice or a virtue; whether it be better to kiss a post, or throw it into the fire... (from Gulliver's Travels)
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform