>Hi!
>
>From what I know, the majority of the VFP people wanted to include VFP in the .NET. After announcement from MS that VFO pulled out from .NET VFP sreamed a lot here in UT. Did you read these threads?
>
>Personally, I attended the Miami DEVCON last year, but I was not able to find where this discussion was to even see it. Do you think the 'Majority' of people are just VFP gurus attended Miami DEVCON that talked with MS? This is not majority. Just people that attend DEVCONS, quite active in the writing articles and like to discuss something (usually MVPs), and attracted by MS. Well, you think they can talk with MS for all VFP community. But the Majority is not these people.
>
>Let me know if I missed something. I understand that after such words I can never get MVP status, but its pity to see how MS rule us, VFP developers, instead of doing something really needed for real VFP majority.
>
>


Hi Vlad,

I believe (from Craig's post to me regarding the same question) that in order to be a part of the .NET framework some intrinsic VFP abilities would have had to be removed, including native data handling. That would have been anathema to all.

Also, if MS give MVP's for sheer effort, willingness to help others and excellent content, you should be on the top list mate!

Cheers,

Sanjay