Information générale
Catégorie:
Codage, syntaxe et commandes
Alex-
>As always, many ways to skin a fox. But I like the PADL() solution (that's the one I normally use). A quick unscientific timing of these functions in a loop showed PADL() to be over 40% faster. And using "@L 99", although there is nothing seriously wrong with it, looks to me a little '2.6ish'. <g>
TRANSFORM isn't 2.6ish, is it? And we still have Format and InputMask clauses.
Nice benchmark info, though. I like TRANSFORM when I don't know what sort of data I'll be seeing, or if it's more readable. Just my .02 USD.
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Voir le fil de ce thread
Voir le fil de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement
Voir tous les messages de ce thread
Voir tous les messages de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement