Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
COM/COM+ obsolete?
Message
De
31/07/2001 12:16:38
Nancy Folsom
Pixel Dust Industries
Washington, États-Unis
 
 
À
31/07/2001 10:24:02
Information générale
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Catégorie:
COM/DCOM et OLE Automation
Divers
Thread ID:
00537440
Message ID:
00537811
Vues:
25
Brian-

>I'm struggling with figuring out what a good second language to become familiar with would be. I was thinking of maybe VC++ or the newer C#. Since I've never had a "formal" programming background, either one will probably be equally as daunting.

Actually C# is _much_ less daunting than VC++, IMO. It's not so easy to shoot yourself in the foot, for one *g*.

I'm sure I shouldn't admit this, but I found C# to be something of a struggle to shift into the syntax. Not the trivial stuff like semicolons end a line, but bigger stuff, like terminology ("constructors", for a simple example), and the event binding was a little weird. I still haven't totally grokked that yet. It got easier when I stopped trying to translate everything into VFP terms, though. And I think it's just damned cool. Plus, I'm grateful I don't have to learn VB now. ;-)

I see there's a C# group here.

>Not to mention there's a whole lot of unproven technology in it. But, it'll be a fun project, and I envy that you have a .NET application in your lap. *g*
>

>
>Maybe not in my lap yet, but it would be nice if I could get a bit more involved instead. Perhaps an after-hours project is in order...

What's funny is what I'm hearing from my VB friends is that companies are very wary of dumping code into .NET. (Though no doubt there's a huge variation in attitude out there.) The folks I know really doing stuff are software house and control's vendors...people who have control over the choice and who are C++ shops. Warning, this all just anectodatal evidence and so it worth spit. *s*
Précédent
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform