Hi!
>Hi Vlad,
>
>>>I am using service pack 5 VFP6 and MS still did not resolve the
>>>"Invalid file descriptor" error which I hope in version 7 it would
>>>be gone.
>>>
>>
>>You can report it as a bug to MS site or put it into VFP 8 wishes list document.
>
>Yes I can report that but it could be resolved in VFP 7. Any way do you have the URL for that?
>
Just testing in VFP7, it is already released. I doubt such little bug will be posted anywhere in the lists for VFP7.
>>>If you have any other ideas let me know.
>>
>>>Well, I observing this thread from start and have one idea.
>>>Why you store class in the separate EXE file? Is not it much easy to store it >>into the FXP file? I understand that this will require to turn the VCX into >>the PRG file that is a 5 minutes of work if you have no classes with objects >>containership tree deeper than 2 levels. However, you will have a benefit - >>FXP takes less space, and it cause no bugs like mentioned in this thread when >>you SET PROCEDURE it and than use CreateObject/AddObject instead of NewObject.
>
>Well, this a query engine(QE)that was developed by my company and I compiled all as an EXE for now. Well you've got a point there. I also have a lot of classes to convert as well. If I would convert those classes to PRGs I will need it in an EXE format since the QE is a separate module.
>
Ok, understand now.
Vlad Grynchyshyn, Project Manager, MCP
vgryn@yahoo.comICQ #10709245
The professional level of programmer could be determined by level of stupidity of his/her bugs
It is not appropriate to say that question is "foolish". There could be only foolish answers. Everybody passed period of time when knows nothing about something.