>>>In this case, it means marketing has gotten hold of it.
>>
>>(as I sit here grinning and shaking my head)
>>
>>Craaaaig, Your not being cynical again are you?
>
>
>It's all marketing. Why do you think that OLE became ActiveX then COM then COM+ then .Net?
>

Hey Craig,

In a previous message to you, Ken Levy said that COM+ is *not* an evolution of COM. Did I misread his message? Or, are you saying that you believe COM+ really is an evolution of COM?

Thread #526321 Message #527198