>>>What evidence do you have for this? I've seen Rushmore reject an available index in a join and create a temp index instead.
>>>
>>The fact that an index on DELETED() will always be used (when DELETED is ON) is good enough for me.
>
>But we were talking about indexes for _joins_ here. DELETED() is irrelevant to joins.
>
>Tamar

My mistake - I thought it had 'degenerated' to Rushmore in general.