>This is interesting, I didnt even think of using IN. Problem is though for >now, any code I write that has to be run on regular basis has to be >supported by my FPW 2.6 App. Using IN clause in 2.6 is only supported for >a value set. I'm using IN with subqueries ever since FP2.0 - just try it. >Interesting huh? I'm trying real hard not think about the fact that the >32-bit environment didnt perform as well as the 16-bit environment. ;) FPD2.6 came in two variants - 16 and 32 bit, the 32 being usable as soon as 1.5M of EMS/XMS was available. I thought it was paralleled in FPW. Well, I am probably wrong.