>Didn't you know that I don't use buffering? BTW, VFP6 will have function >allowing SEEKing without moving pointer. In regard to second problem: it's >not difficult to have routine finding new 'unique' key value to shift out >deleted record. BTW, the normal process could also involve 'safe deletion': >when you delete a record, candidate key values get replaced by some >reserved sequence (e.g. "000001","000002", etc.). > >Privet Sevastopolyu. What's the difference between the next version's IndexSeek() and the KeyMatch()? IndexSeek() will not be as buggy?