General information
Category:
Coding, syntax & commands
It should be. Test for your self and see. I never tested it. In the same time, if you don't have a large number of macrosubstitutions, it doesn't matter.
Vlad
>Is this faster?
>
>>Try
>>
>>_VFP.DoCmd(ccommand)
>>
>>Vlad
>>
>>>ccommand = 'SELECT *,RECNO() AS flagrecno FROM ' + THIS.recordsource + ;
>>> ' WHERE ' + THIS.cflagfield + ' = .T. INTO CURSOR mycursor'
>>>&ccommand
>>>
>>>SCAN
>>> i = i+1
>>> GOTO (mycursor.flagrecno) IN (THIS.recordsource)
>>> ccommand = 'REPLACE ' + THIS.cseqfield + ' WITH nseq + i IN ' + THIS.recordsource
>>> &ccommand
>>>ENDSCAN
>>>
>>>Above are two sections of codes I have in my methods. I am wondering if there is a way I can avoid using macro substitution.
>>>
>>>Thanks in advance.
>>>
>>>
>>>Tai
Previous
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only