>>was because IE4 was integral to it and IE4 is not even a good beta yet. I
>>don't see how anyone running this software (or testing it) at MS could have
>>allowed it out the door in its present situation. The person who approved
>>the release of IE4 has a serious case bad judgement. Some might even say
>>insanity. mmmm. a thought occurred to me -- what if it was someone
>>intent on destroying MS?
>>Jerry
>
>I thought that being quick on conspiracy theories was a Serb
>speciality... OTOH, maybe the responsible person was working for
>Borland, Netscape or someone else before? The sweets of revenge. Well,
>we can only guess. Anyway, I've warned my BBSers in Belgrade not to be
>too quick with it, just in case.

Good advice, Dragan.
I am not given to bashing and I am not bashing MS. When IE 40 stabilizes I WILL switch to it, as I will also go to Win98 when it is finally released. However, as a former consultant (retired) I would also have advised all of my clients to hold off until the second or third release. I love the IE 4.0 paradigm, but I can also afford to wait until it is ready for prime time.
Jerry