>>Hilmar,
>>I'm sorry that my post was against your rules but it's actual working code that person can use right away. Yes, I've 2.6 version of Filetostr and Strtofile but I don't see a reason to rewrite working code.
>
>Not "against my rules"; this was simply a suggestion. And this suggestion doesn't seem to apply to your case: actual working code. I agree completely: it isn't worth the trouble to rewrite it.
>
>My suggestion would apply, rather, to any case where a quick solution is offered for VFP6, and someone complains "But I use VFP5!". Or earlier.
>
>Hilmar.
>
Yes, you are right about that.