Well, my point was that on that one page(http://msdn.microsoft.com/vfoxpro/prodinfo/qa.asp) they are honestly talking about the strengths of VFP over VB, VC++, and Access. That's different than what I've seen before. I don't think anybody seriously expects them to jeopardize the VB/Access cash cow by trying to persuade them to jump to VFP..

>>>Yeah, but it's nice when they compare it favorably to VB,C++, and Access which I don't think they did with vfp 6:
>>>http://msdn.microsoft.com/vfoxpro/prodinfo/qa.asp
>>
>>MS probably never will put VFP ahead of any of their other products.
>
>
>You're right. VFP will never get the resources of VB and others.