>I agree, Gary, that myself and a couple of other were exceptions. All that >I have been reading suggests that IE4 is nothing short of a nightmare for >most people. It was beautiful for me but extremely unreliable starting up >and shutting down. I now believe that the real reason MS postponed Win98 >was because IE4 was integral to it and IE4 is not even a good beta yet. I Interesting theory. It certainly makes sense. >don't see how anyone running this software (or testing it) at MS could have >allowed it out the door in its present situation. The person who approved >the release of IE4 has a serious case bad judgement. Some might even say >insanity. mmmm. a thought occurred to me -- what if it was someone >intent on destroying MS? If bad software could bring down MSFT, Windows would have done so a long time ago. <g> Gary J. Sibio