>If you structure it correctly, you should be able to write a version of your DB to work with either/both.
>
>>Hi
>>
>>I thought this article was very direct from MS - they seem to be implying that Oracle is a product in trouble.
>>
>>Is this just general chit-chat, or does anyone think it is fair comment - you see, we may have to choose one day whether to convert one of our Fox Db's into Oracle or Sql Server and will also be considering which company will rule the DB market.
>>
>>Any comments?
>>
>>Thanks
>>Kev
That is true, although I have yet to experience designing/building objects that can support multiple types of DB.
Kev
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Voir le fil de ce thread
Voir le fil de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement
Voir tous les messages de ce thread
Voir tous les messages de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement