>
>Yeah I did notice that they weren't moving into Unix, but the comments from MS could still be very misleading, considering some people might only read the first couple of paragrapahs.
>
>So why would they say that Oracle was in trouble?
>
>Kev

He answers that in the same paragraph:

"If you look at Oracle, it's a one product company. Oracle is in serious trouble. It's revenues are down, its applications aren't any good and its database revenues fell 5 per cent. And we are stealing market share from them very easily. Oracle is getting hit from all angles. IBM is hammering from it from one side and we are hammering it from the other. They're trying, there's no doubt about that, but Oracle is a company in trouble"