>>>>Sorry, off topic: this photo seems to be not contrast enough, I barely can see you. I liked the previous one...
>>>
>>>Nadya, most people do not take kindly your nitpicking of the smallest, most insignicant detail, especially when wasting time to meet whatever your idea of acceptable is gains absolutley nothing.
>>>
>>>Great picture, Cathy!
>>
>>Sorry, Mike. I guess, it's just my character... I should have sent it in private anyway...
>
>Nadya;
>
>I was not aware that Mike had taken a poll or by some means had conclusive evidence that what he has stated is true. Now it might seem like a little thing to Mike but I am not sure. Seems like you stated a fact about Cathy’s new picture and I agree it is lacking in contrast! Mike preferred to attack you on a number of personal grounds, which might be perception or emotion on his part.

Thomas,

I think, Mike is right at the point, that it was not diplomatic or tactic from my part to make this statement publicly, I haven't thought about it and I admit, it was wrong. However, it was not offensive at all and as you fairy mentioned, I just stated a fact, what for not a good resolution, this photo lacks contrast.

>Now, I for one would have rather not seen Mikes response to you take that form. That would have been better if it was sent to you as a private message. I think Mike is speaking for himself and is not the “UT” Police!
>
>Tom

Still I see sense in his observations...

Anyway, this discussion drives this thread in another absolutely unrelated field, so we may start another one in Chatter section or drop this subject completely... :)