>That's why I said "seems". Even though he didn't specify, from reading his post, is sounds as though he's the one using 95. :)
>

Michelle

AFAIK, there's no reason why he couldn't develop under Win95. However, if I had to hazard a guess as to why it isn't listed in the system requirements, I would say that since Win95 will not be supported after this year, there was little, if any, point in doing so.