>I posted this but I am not sure I direct it to you (I think I replied to myself only) so you problably didn't get it the first time. Here is it just in case.
>
>--------------------------
>In case defining the 10 elements separated matters, in other words, if it does not work, what you could do is: instead of defining an array of 10 ADDR_REC elements, you could define a buffer to hold them, something like
>
>

>Return ;
>	"TCHAR 0c700:stack"
>

>
>Where 700 = 70 bytes for each ADDR_REC x 10 elements. I came up with that 70, you will need to actually count how many bytes are needed for each ADDR_REC.
>
>If you decide to go this route, then you probably wouldn't need the ADDR_REC class that I mentioned in my previous message. This single definition (with a large enough buffer) should work.

Hector,

Got this one :-)

I'm setting up a test run using the ADDR_REC_STACK class first. If that doesn't work then one would assume that a large buffer to hold the whole thing would work instead.

I'll let you know how it goes.

Ed