General information
Category:
Coding, syntax & commands
Now there's a good idea. It's a little messy, but this class is really messy anyway. :) I'll give that a try.
Thanks,
Michelle
>I guess another option would be to create a wrapper method with a different name that accepts the parameter then calls the original code.
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only