>>Erm. No, of course not. I don't see where Rajesh says it's a not a VFP timer.
>
>It can still be a VFP Timer and not based directly on the VFP base class (subclass in between), thats what I meant.
I knew that.
>
>>Sheesh. Tough crowd.
>
>:-) You'd think I woudln't get this bored with so much work to do. Strange...
Yeah, I hear you. Ya think +I+ have any biddness being here?
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Voir le fil de ce thread
Voir le fil de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement
Voir tous les messages de ce thread
Voir tous les messages de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement