>>Evidence of improvement, rather than deterioration, might have ended the tune too. I'm glad I didn't disappoint you, though.
>
>The VFP7 HTML Help is so far ahead of VFP6's. I know for a fact the amounts of document changes requested by the beta testers is massive. If you haven't noticed them, I doubt you're looking as closely at the docs as you say you are.
>
>In any case, next VFP beta, apply for the group and submit all the problems with the docs as you want.

Mike,

That really is good to hear. But is it possible that something got 'lost' along the way?
I said that I had only reviewed a small part of the documentation. I am looking closely! But I have not even come close to having looked at all of it.

Maybe, once I've read more of it, I'll see things differently. I hope so. I wouldn't expect much different, but it will be very nice if it is.

By the way I'll bet I was one of the first here to state that the new format was miles better than the old one. Seemed like I got MSDN Library (July) earlier than most and virtually as soon as I found this IMPROVEMENT I commented on it.