>It isn't at all the case, that I can't live without bugs. I just want to avoid spending such a lot of time I did with VFP3 to sort out my "homebrew" ones from the ones of VFP. And not knowing of any issue always leave room for the thought of just not having found "the list". ;-)

Generally speaking, the Microsoft KB is a good resource for this. If we find a bug, we almost always write a KB article for it. So if you think you've found a problem, search on VFP, "BUG" and any useful search terms to narrow it down.

>PS. Hmmm .. for 63k bugs my W2K is running dammned stable I think ;-)

That's because most of those were probably duplicates, resolved "couldn't reproduce", and the like. As discussed at length in another thread, I'm sure Windows 2000 shipped with known bugs. I just don't think they were all real bugs, in that a "bug" at Microsoft means any entry in the bug database, valid or not.