>Hey, no need to apologize. It is Sunday, afterall.

Like that makes a difference today. Spent most of it working on squeezing my DevCon sessions down to the allotted time. Of course, thanks to my wireless home network, at least my day was spent enjoying the sunshine on my back porch. :-) Alas, I spent most of the time connected to the Microsoft corpnet looking for test code (read: "potential sample code"), making UT access a bit of a pain.

> Didn't mean to be a bitch, was just waving my S.O.S. flag in your general direction. :)

Umm, which part of your message bitchy? You couldn't get it to work due to some sort of documented quirk in the provider, and you asked for help. Well, okay, you did imply that the provider was broken. :-P

>Jim found the notation in the ReadMe. I definitely count this as a bug despite the workaround.

Yeah, me, too. I seem to recall some discussion on it at some point, but I don't recall the resolution.

>Thanks for taking a look at it.

'tis me job, lass.