Yeah, I agree. I like to see a variable, field name or object and know immediately what it supposed to be - which depends on, of course, whether everyone modifying the code is following the standards or not. I personally try to follow the basic standard that I find already in an application, unless it is especially egregious. In my own I try to follow the naming convention standards suggested for the language.

Renoir

>Hi!
>
>May be. Just my impression because here we use a lot of standards, keep them very accurate and follow them exactly. After long time of working using these standards I may feel bad reading code with another standard ;) However, I know that these standards also caused better readability compare to my old code...
>
>>>< SNIP >
>>>Also naming convention for field names in the table by using type chracter (cCharField, mMemoField etc.) is very good idea because readability of the program code increase.
>>
>>Not really, it's just a matter of personal preferences.
>>
>>< SNIP >