>SNIP
>>
>>My point here is that, while the US and Canada mostly use single pass single vote systems for governmental elections, they're not the only effective voting systems out there. And someone proposing an alternative isn't necessarily trying to rig the vote.
>>
>I've already said how I came to the conclusion that it was an attempt at rigging the vote, and I stand by it. Other legitimate alternatives have nothing to do with this.
>
>JimN

You would still be wrong. Ken wants a consensus not a plurality.