Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
View with buffered table
Message
From
21/10/1997 13:21:05
 
 
To
21/10/1997 12:53:54
Sonny Chouinard
CHCA Computer Systems Inc.
Lachenaie, Quebec, Canada
General information
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Category:
Other
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
00055762
Message ID:
00055794
Views:
33
>>>>I have a grid based on a view.
>>>>When the user click on the new command button, the system display a modal form for him to enter the information.
>>>>After the modal form is closed, a INSERT-SQL is done in the buffered table, a Requery() is perfomed on the view and the grid is refreshed.
>>>>My problem is that the grid doesn't show the new record until the new record is commited to the table.
>>>>I want the grid to show all records, buffered or not.
>>>>How can I do that?
>>>
>>>You can APPEND new record to view only without Insert-SQL to underlying table. This case (I assume you use Table buffering) you will see non-commited record in grid, although it's not in table yet.
>>
>>I can't append the view, because:
>>A) The view don't have all the fields of the original table
>>B) The view is based on joined tables and only one need to be updated
>
>For the A clause, it doesn't matter if you don't have all the fields but, you must
>have all the fields that represents the primary key of the table.
>For the B clause, If you want to append just 1 table. You should check the update
>checkbox for only the fields of the desired table.

I included all the fields in the view and made them all updatable (except for the fields of the other table).
Then, I issued an APPEND on the view and REPLACEd the fields.

Guess what? It's worst! Now, not only I don't see the added record in the grid, it's never commited to the table!

I guess the view will commit the change on the next TABLEUPDATE(), but I don't want to issue it right now because the user can still revert it's change at this time.

Maybe I will look at the BEGIN/END TRANSACTION commands.

Is this my only alternative?
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform