>http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/comment/0,5859,2813850,00.html

mmm... Al, I looked but couldn't find a reference to VFP in that link. At least "Find" didn't see it.

I did notice,however, that this article did something that even Microsoft had taken up. Remember when W2K was announced? Amazingly, Microsoft started targeting Win95 and Win98 as being unstable and a good reason to install W2K. But, prior to those ads you never heard any admission from Redmond that Win95 or Win98 were anything but stable. The only 'faint' praise I have been seeing was in reference to Win2000 not being as stable as XP.

Orwellian NewSpeak, indeed.