>Mike,
>
>>> Or can IMPLEMENTS be used with native Fox objects (in other words giving Fox classes pseudo-multiple-inheritance)?
>>
>>IMPLEMENTS cannot be used in that manner, and I'd argue that you wouldn't want to anyway. Multiple inheritance: yuck.
>
>I agree about multi. inheritance, but the implements clause (as used in Java) allows the mult. inheritance of behavior without having to totally meld to classes. I hear it is an elegant compromise, though my Java knowledge (almost none) doesn't really give me the right to talk... *smile*
>
>JoeK

A recent article in FoxTalk was about decorating a class/object instead of subclassing it. At the end, it mentioned the strategy could be used to simulate multiple inheritance.