>>So, at best, you've duplicate functionality, as well as program bloat.
>
>Ok. We've gone down this road before. I usually bring up the point about 64bit 2ghz processors right about now and you can't get past adding any overhead to the product :-)

Actually, even the 2.0 ghz P4's provide only the same throughput as a 1.3 AMD Athlon, but that's besides the point.:-) Even with 60 gig hard drives, it's still something to be concerned about.

>>>Then you totally missed my point :-)
>>Naw, not really.< g >
>
>Actually, you did. Based on your arguements, you're stilling think about how the enhancements would immediatly benefit your work. I'm thinking about how it would round the product out, make it more consitant and elegant, which would make it easier to learn (and teach) attracting more and more new users.

Sigh...OK, Mike, I didn't miss your point at all. In fact, to be perfectly clear about this since you seemed to have missed it, read my lips

I agree with you!

It's not that I don't want these things. It's not that I don't agree with the ease learning the product. It's that I don't think it's gonna happen. That's it.

Note to self: If Mike H. doesn't get this, sic "DukeDaddy" on him